Dabei handelt es sich um ein Downcycling-Verfahren, bei dem Textilfasern in Füllstoffe oder Füllmaterialien umgewandelt werden, anstatt auf Deponien zu landen oder verbrannt zu werden. Oft können sie nicht upgecycelt werden, weil die Materialzusammensetzungen vermischt sind (z. B. Polyester mit Baumwolle). Bei diesem Verfahren werden die Textilabfälle geschreddert oder in kleinere Stücke verarbeitet, die als Füllmaterial für verschiedene Produkte wie Kissen, Matratzen oder Dämmstoffe verwendet werden können. Es ist eine der einfachsten Recyclingmethoden, die zudem wenig Energie braucht, dafür aber im Einsatz limitiert ist.

Der Claim bezieht sich auf den Prozess der Wiederverwendung von Abfallstoffen, die nicht auf Deponien landen, sondern als Füllstoffe wiederverwendet werden. Dabei werden ausrangierte Materialien in nützliche Füllstoffe umgewandelt, die einen neuen Zweck erfüllen und die Abfallmenge auf den Deponien verringern.

Gemischte Textilien sind schwer zu recyceln und landen oft auf Mülldeponien oder werden verbrannt. Wir haben einen Weg gefunden, sie für einen guten Zweck zu verwenden. Sie werden als Füllmaterial in nicht sichtbare Teile unserer Taschen und Rucksäcke eingearbeitet. Wir sehen das als temporäre Lösung bis sich belastbare und sortenreine Recyclingströme etabliert haben.

We look where others don‘t look. In the past, we followed the industry standard and also used PP boards (Polypropylene) and PE foams (Polyethylene) as fillers in our backpacks. They are used to make a backpack stiff and soft at the time. We were successful in replacing them with felt material from mixed industrial textile waste. This saves 4-5% of virgin fossil materials per backpack.

Fiber-to-fiber recycling is a closed-loop process where used textile fibers are transformed into new fibers for creating new textile products, reducing waste and maximizing material reuse. The process we use is called chemical recycling.

Es handelt sich um eine spezielle Methode des Textilrecyclings, bei der synthetische Fasern wie Polyester in ihre ursprünglichen chemischen Bausteine zerlegt und dann zur Herstellung neuer synthetischer Fasern verwendet werden.

Das von uns verwendete chemische Recyclingverfahren basiert auf der Verzuckerung, Vergärung und Alkoholyse. Es befindet sich noch in einem frühen Stadium der technologischen Entwicklung und Kommerzialisierung. Unsere erste Produktion im Jahr 2023 lief noch auf Pilotanlagen und noch wesentlich teurer als das Bottle-to-Fiber Recycling.

It will be a game changer for the textile industry. It is one of the most sustainable and scalable levers available. Once fully mature, estimates indicate that 70% of textile waste could be fiber-to-fiber recycled.
_{Mehr Information Scaling textile recycling in Europe–turning waste into value, McKinsey, 2022}

Chemical recycling nowadays needs an input with 80% material purity. In our case, this means we need to have textiles with 80% polyester and max. 20% other fibers e.g. cotton. Also, the energy consumption is higher than in mechanical recycling. The higher the material purity, the less energy is needed for chemical recycling. That&"s why our goal is to make products from pure mono-fibers such as 100% PET.

Even so, more energy is needed than when recycling plastic bottles, but it&"s roughly 4x times less than that you need to put in virgin material. Numbers provided by Intertech show that the cumulative energy demand for 1kg of polyester chips from virgin polyester is 72 MJ (Megajoule). That of polyester chips from recycled textiles in chemical recycling is only 20 MJ. We assume the process will become more efficient over the years.

We're going all out here! 100% of the granules we gain in fiber-to-fiber recycling are from recycled textiles. We believe that we can only help to establish this technology when we buy large amounts. Other brands use an amount of 5-20% only and still sell it as &"recycled from textiles&".

Today it is still difficult to buy old clothing with only certain ingredients. The development of a uniform take-back system for textiles is not yet established. The material composition is still a matter of luck. For our chemical recycling process to run most efficiently, we need a high percentage of polyester. So half of the textiles come from used school and hospital uniforms and the other half are leftovers from cutting material of the garment industry. To save emissions in transportation this textile waste is sourced from China too. All of them are REACH compatible!

The usual material waste in a sewing workshop is around 15-20%. We have succeeded in reducing this proportion to around 10%. That is still a lot of material that is wasted, even if you consider that additional waste is generated with every material production. This adds up to around 28% of all materials used. We are working with our suppliers to reduce waste material and wherever possible, to return it to a circular process soon.

The very most items we produce were demanded by our customers, so there are no leftovers. Sometimes we discontinue products, so they get sold for a discounted price. Even items that get returned, get sold again after we have cleaned and checked them. The number of defective items which cannot be used again is very small – and would not have a positive effect on emissions if we send them back to our recycling facility in China.

Through our innovative measures, Ucon Acrobatics is already achieving extremely high rates of up to 85% of recycled textiles per product by weight. Thus, numerous products would already meet the criteria of "recyclable" or "circular". There is still no uniform take-back system for textiles close to every household yet. We support the process that the European Union plans to establish. Sending back products to us would cause additional emissions.